登录 注册
登录 注册

Bivariate Frank Copula: Some More Results on Point 估计 (Estimation) of the Association Parameter from a 贝叶斯 (Bayesian) Perspective and Revisiting the Goodness of Fit Tests with an Application to 模型 (Model) Groundwater 数据 (Data) from Dong Thap, Vietnam
Bivariate Frank Copula: Some More Results on Point Estimation of the Association Parameter from a Bayesian Perspective and Revisiting the Goodness of Fit Tests with an Application to Model Groundwater Data from Dong Thap, Vietnam

🔗 访问原文
🔗 Access Paper

📝 摘要
Abstract

This work has two major parts. First, we extend the recent study of Pham et al. (2025) on point estimation of the association parameter of a bivariate Frank copula. We investigate two Bayes estimators under the generalized flat prior and the Jeffreys prior, and compare them with the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). Simulation results show that, for small sample sizes (n <= 25), the Bayes estimator under the Jeffreys prior uniformly outperforms both the generalized flat prior estimator and the MLE in terms of mean squared error (MSE). For moderate and large sample sizes, all estimators have very similar performances in terms of bias and MSE. We also discuss computational issues in the R package implementation that may significantly affect the computation of the MLE for very small samples. In the second part, we apply the Frank copula to analyze the association between groundwater arsenic concentration and other hydrochemical variables using a recent dataset from Vietnam. We revisit the goodness-of-fit tests proposed by Genest et al. (2006), investigate several non-intuitive behaviors of the test statistics, and provide extensive simulated critical value tables. Our results complement and refine the computational findings reported in the earlier literature.

📊 文章统计
Article Statistics

基础数据
Basic Stats

103 浏览
Views
0 下载
Downloads
29 引用
Citations

引用趋势
Citation Trend

阅读国家分布
Country Distribution

阅读机构分布
Institution Distribution

月度浏览趋势
Monthly Views

相关关键词
Related Keywords

影响因子分析
Impact Analysis

5.30 综合评分
Overall Score
引用影响力
Citation Impact
浏览热度
View Popularity
下载频次
Download Frequency

📄 相关文章
Related Articles

🌊