SEMMS with Random Effects: A Mixed-模型 (Model) Extension for Variable Selection in Clustered and Longitudinal 数据 (Data)

SEMMS with Random Effects: A Mixed-Model Extension for Variable Selection in Clustered and Longitudinal Data

SEMMS (Scalable Empirical-Bayes Model for Marker Selection) is a variable-selection procedure for generalized linear models that uses a three-component normal mixture prior on regression coefficients. In its original form, SEMMS assumes that all observations are independent. Many real-world datasets, however, arise from repeated-measures or clustered designs in which observations within the same subject are correlated. Ignoring this correlation inflates the apparent residual variance and can severely degrade variable-selection performance. We extend SEMMS to accommodate random intercepts, random slopes, or both, via an alternating coordinate-ascent algorithm. After each round of fixed-effect variable selection, the subject-level best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) are updated with \texttt{lmer} (Gaussian) or \texttt{glmer} (non-Gaussian); the fixed-effect step then operates on the random-effect-adjusted response. We describe the algorithm, evaluate its performance in three Gaussian simulation studies spanning a range of signal strengths, random-effect magnitudes, and sample/predictor-space regimes, and present a semi-synthetic real-data example. We further extend the framework to non-Gaussian families (Poisson, binomial) via an IRLS working-response adaptation: at each outer iteration the fixed-effects step uses the RE-adjusted working response computed from the current \texttt{glmer} fitted values rather than the raw response. When the fixed-effect signal is strong relative to the random-effect variance, both the original and extended procedures perform comparably. When the random-effect variance dominates -- the scenario most likely to cause plain SEMMS to fail -- the mixed-model extension recovers the exact true predictor set in 93\% of simulated datasets (Gaussian), 61\% (Poisson), and 65\% (binomial), compared with 1\%, 45\%, and 39\% for plain SEMMS respectively.