登录 注册

Empirical Confirmation of the Square-Root Law of Market Impact in a U.S. Large-Cap Equity

🔗 访问原文
🔗 Access Paper

📝 摘要
Abstract

We test the square-root law (SRL) of market impact on a single U.S. large-capitalisation equity, Apple Inc. (AAPL), using the full Nasdaq TotalView-ITCH market-by-order feed over 178 trading days (2 December 2024 -- 19 August 2025; ~0.5 billion events). Without broker-tagged parent orders, we reconstruct metaorders from the anonymous tape and calibrate impact as $I/σ_D = c\,(Q/V_D)^{1/2}$ with the exponent fixed at the universal value $1/2$. We find $c_{\rm raw} = 0.69$ (bias-corrected $c_{\rm eff} = 0.34$), conditional impact tracking $Q^{1/2}$, and a size-distribution tail exponent $β= 1.54 \pm 0.15$ -- both consistent with the worldwide cross-section. A direct model comparison decisively prefers the square-root form over linear ($Δ{\rm AIC}=22$) and logarithmic impact, and the prefactor holds ($c_{\rm raw} \in [0.63, 0.77]$) across every reconstruction setting. Two structural tests confirm the impact is genuine: shuffling trade signs collapses directional impact to chance (86% to 51%); and scrambling event chronology destroys the SRL (0 of 80 calibrations remain viable). The underlying order flow is long-memory ($γ=0.66$) while the price stays diffusive (Hurst 0.49) -- the two ingredients of the universality theories. The prefactor is stable across 32 weekly walk-forward re-calibrations. To our knowledge this is the first confirmation of the square-root law on a U.S. equity derived purely from anonymous order flow, without broker-tagged parent orders.

📊 文章统计
Article Statistics

基础数据
Basic Stats

102 浏览
Views
0 下载
Downloads
30 引用
Citations

引用趋势
Citation Trend

阅读国家分布
Country Distribution

阅读机构分布
Institution Distribution

月度浏览趋势
Monthly Views

相关关键词
Related Keywords

影响因子分析
Impact Analysis

6.20 综合评分
Overall Score
引用影响力
Citation Impact
浏览热度
View Popularity
下载频次
Download Frequency

📄 相关文章
Related Articles

海洋智能分析Ocean AI Analysis

正在分析中,请稍候…Analyzing, please wait…
海洋智能体 🌊
海洋智能体
AI科研助手 · 2300篇文献
我看到你正在阅读一篇文献,需要我帮你解读摘要、推荐相关论文,或者分析研究方法论吗?