Generative AI is fast becoming the first place people turn for expert advice. The advice it provides can be directional rather than neutral, shaped in part by the choices of its designers and regulators. When clients consult AI before meeting an expert, they carry this directional advice into a relationship that once rested on the expert's judgment alone. We study its consequences in healthcare through a large-scale preregistered field experiment at a Chinese hospital, where we randomize patients' access to an AI chatbot before their outpatient visit. Examination of the conversation logs shows that the chatbot routinely cautions against the use of medications, especially Traditional Chinese Medicine and antibiotics, while issuing clean recommendations for diagnostic testing, consistent with the liability-driven guardrails encoded in AI training. This directionality propagates into clinical practice. Prescription rates decline among treated patients while diagnostic testing increases, and these effects are more pronounced among physicians who are receptive to patient input and those with more intensive prescribing styles. Beyond shifting healthcare utilization, survey results show that AI access reduces patient compliance and satisfaction, shifting the balance of authority between patients and physicians.
🌊
