Principal component analysis (PCA) is optimal for the linear reconstruction of Gaussian data, a foundational property underlying its central role in algorithms and signal processing. Its nonlinear analogue, however, is notoriously subtle: in 2011, Mallat and Zeitouni conjectured that the Karhunen--Loève (KL) basis remains optimal even when the retained coordinates are chosen adaptively per sample, a property that would theoretically justify the ubiquitous pipeline of PCA followed by sparse thresholding. In this paper, we establish a $1+O(1/\sqrt{d})$-approximate version of the retained-energy form of the Mallat--Zeitouni conjecture, showing that the KL basis is within this factor of the optimal basis. This dimension-free comparison depends only on the number of retained coordinates and shows that the possible advantage of optimizing over all orthonormal bases vanishes as $d$ grows. It complements the universal-constant reconstruction-error comparison of Litvak and Tikhomirov (Ann. Appl. Probab., 2018), while providing a comparison naturally suited for algorithmic analysis. Our proof rests on a clean, conceptual reduction: we relax arbitrary rotations to a deterministic threshold bound via Schur--Horn majorization, and identify the remaining loss with the correlation gap of the rank-$d$ uniform matroid over Gaussian level sets.
🌊
