登录 注册

Group boarding for airplanes: benchmarking static policies and optimizing dynamic assignment with deep reinforcement learning

🔗 访问原文
🔗 Access Paper

📝 摘要
Abstract

Improving boarding efficiency reduces airplane turnaround time and improves passenger experience. Airlines typically assign passengers to a few sequential boarding groups using static seat-based rules. Yet arrivals, seat choices, and luggage are sequential and random, and a static rule ignores the seats earlier passengers have already taken. We propose the first dynamic formulation of boarding group assignment. As each passenger checks in, we observe earlier passengers' seats and groups, the current passenger's seat, and optional luggage information, then assign a group while keeping companions together. We formulate dynamic group assignment as a Markov decision process and solve it with reinforcement learning (RL). The policy uses a convolutional neural network to encode the checked-in seat-assignment state and is trained by proximal policy optimization. The reward balances total boarding time and average individual boarding time. We benchmark the proposed RL policy against three companion-compatible static policies (back-to-front, modified Steffen, and alternating block) in an in-house simulator covering six single- and double-aisle layouts. Back-to-front with optimized group sizes achieves the shortest total boarding time and average individual boarding time among the static benchmarks across all layouts. The dynamic RL policy further outperforms it on both metrics in every layout. On a representative case, the RL policy outperforms the optimal back-to-front by up to 9.8\% in total boarding time and 22.8\% in average individual time. Sweeping the reward weight yields an approximate Pareto frontier for operator choice. Trained policies remain robust under out-of-distribution operating conditions, including varying load factors, companion sizes, and luggage loads.

📊 文章统计
Article Statistics

基础数据
Basic Stats

38 浏览
Views
0 下载
Downloads
4 引用
Citations

引用趋势
Citation Trend

阅读国家分布
Country Distribution

阅读机构分布
Institution Distribution

月度浏览趋势
Monthly Views

相关关键词
Related Keywords

影响因子分析
Impact Analysis

6.60 综合评分
Overall Score
引用影响力
Citation Impact
浏览热度
View Popularity
下载频次
Download Frequency

📄 相关文章
Related Articles

海洋智能分析Ocean AI Analysis

正在分析中,请稍候…Analyzing, please wait…
海洋智能体 🌊
海洋智能体
AI科研助手 · 2818篇文献
我看到你正在阅读一篇文献,需要我帮你解读摘要、推荐相关论文,或者分析研究方法论吗?