登录 注册

Understanding Venture Capital Syndication in Information Technology Sectors: A Network Formation Perspective

🔗 访问原文
🔗 Access Paper

📝 摘要
Abstract

Venture capital syndication enables investors to pool diligence, share risk, and signal venture quality, while shaping the relationships through which investment networks develop. We examine how prior relationships, network embeddedness, and organizational similarity structure annual co-investment link formation in U.S. information technology venture finance. Using dyad-complete PitchBook panels for the hardware, software, and hybrid subsectors from 1966 to 2024, we test seven mechanisms through full-sample dyadic logit models with dyad-clustered standard errors. Across subsectors, prior collaboration is the most consistent correlate of co-investment; shared partners, geographic proximity, and organizational-type similarity are also positively associated with link formation, while domain overlap, prominence, and experience vary across settings. A static ERGM of the 2024 software network among 1,100 persistently active investors likewise produces positive estimates for triadic closure and geographic homophily and a smaller positive estimate for type homophily. By combining complete dyadic risk sets with a whole-network specification, the study shows how relational persistence, network closure, and homophily jointly structure IT venture syndication networks. In future work, we will extend the analysis with temporal network models, counterfactual simulations of market shocks, and evaluations of network-aware partner recommendations.

📊 文章统计
Article Statistics

基础数据
Basic Stats

38 浏览
Views
0 下载
Downloads
25 引用
Citations

引用趋势
Citation Trend

阅读国家分布
Country Distribution

阅读机构分布
Institution Distribution

月度浏览趋势
Monthly Views

相关关键词
Related Keywords

影响因子分析
Impact Analysis

2.80 综合评分
Overall Score
引用影响力
Citation Impact
浏览热度
View Popularity
下载频次
Download Frequency

📄 相关文章
Related Articles

海洋智能分析Ocean AI Analysis

正在分析中,请稍候…Analyzing, please wait…
海洋智能体 🌊
海洋智能体
AI科研助手 · 3683篇文献
我看到你正在阅读一篇文献,需要我帮你解读摘要、推荐相关论文,或者分析研究方法论吗?