登录 注册

Predictable Failure in Multi-Hop Retrieval: Score-Distributional Confidence Scoring and Abstention

🔗 访问原文
🔗 Access Paper

📝 摘要
Abstract

Multi-hop retrieval failures are not uniformly distributed across queries: they cluster in structurally predictable subpopulations. We prove two results formalizing this structure. First (CWAR Reducibility): confident-failure reduction is achievable if and only if retrieval features carry mutual information about success, a condition satisfied by LLM-judge pipelines but substantially weaker in dense-only settings, explaining the AUC-AC gap between regimes. Second (Feature Regime Complementarity): no single ANN score feature achieves best predictive performance across all failure regimes; the dominant feature differs between datasets (query length on MuSiQue, hop-1 concentration on HoVer), and a constructive witness pair shows each is necessary in one regime and non-contributory in the other. We instantiate these principles in RegimeAbstain, which computes a Retrieval Confidence Score (RCS), a logistic function of up to nine query-ANN structural features, all available without any additional LLM call, and uses it to implement a calibrated abstention policy. We define the Confident-Wrong-Answer Rate (CWAR) metric and evaluate across three multi-hop benchmarks (MuSiQue, 2WikiMultiHopQA, HoVer) and two retrieval architectures (LLM-judge and dense-only), covering five failure regimes with CWAR from 14.5% to 62.1%. RCS achieves best or co-best AUC-AC in all five conditions against eight confidence baselines. On MuSiQue (LLM-judge), RCS reduces CWAR from 39.5% to 20.6% at 50% coverage (47.8% relative reduction), with ECE=0.035. A model trained on MuSiQue transfers to 2WikiMultiHopQA with only -0.5pp AUC loss, confirming the domain-agnostic structure of regime features.

📊 文章统计
Article Statistics

基础数据
Basic Stats

94 浏览
Views
0 下载
Downloads
10 引用
Citations

引用趋势
Citation Trend

阅读国家分布
Country Distribution

阅读机构分布
Institution Distribution

月度浏览趋势
Monthly Views

相关关键词
Related Keywords

影响因子分析
Impact Analysis

7.60 综合评分
Overall Score
引用影响力
Citation Impact
浏览热度
View Popularity
下载频次
Download Frequency

📄 相关文章
Related Articles

海洋智能分析Ocean AI Analysis

正在分析中,请稍候…Analyzing, please wait…
海洋智能体 🌊
海洋智能体
AI科研助手 · 3683篇文献
我看到你正在阅读一篇文献,需要我帮你解读摘要、推荐相关论文,或者分析研究方法论吗?