AI weather prediction (AIWP) models have emerged as a key complement to physics-based numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, and now often outperform them on aggregate skill. Yet, several studies report that physics-based models still forecast extreme events better, in particular record-breaking extremes, based on the evaluation of deterministic forecasts. Here we evaluate heat extreme forecasts from probabilistic AIWP models over global land and show that they clearly outperform the ECMWF IFS ensemble, both raw and post-processed, including for record-breaking events, in all regions and at all lead times considered. AIWP models better forecast the occurrence and intensity of extremes, are better calibrated in the tail and miss fewer records. Station observations confirm these results. We argue that many reported AIWP limitations stem from unsuitable verification choices, specifically comparing deterministic forecasts that target different quantities. Instead, a fair evaluation of extremes necessitates probabilistic verification.
🌊
