登录 注册

Common Signals, Spurious Cross-Excitation, and Identification in Multivariate Hawkes Processes

🔗 访问原文
🔗 Access Paper

📝 摘要
Abstract

Multivariate Hawkes models are widely used to measure endogenous interactions in event data, but latent common signals can generate apparent excitation even without structural interaction. We characterize the resulting linear projection and construct stable, nonnegative Hawkes processes that share the mean intensity and Bartlett spectrum of common-signal models despite having different excitation mechanisms. This establishes a concrete form of second-order non-identification. We derive integrated third-order cumulants for Hawkes processes with Cox immigration and establish generic local identification of normalized structural parameters in two- and three-dimensional systems. An exact-equivalence Monte Carlo experiment demonstrates how third-order information can distinguish mechanisms with identical second-order structure, while revealing substantial finite-sample limitations under weak signals. For a restricted parametric family, we develop Whittle estimation from binned counts, establish consistency and asymptotic normality under appropriate identification conditions, and construct feasible sandwich standard errors accounting for estimated mean intensities. Simulations assess structural recovery and inference accuracy. An application to cryptocurrency transactions illustrates the sensitivity of inferred excitation to model specification and the limitations of structural interpretation based on spectral fit alone.

📊 文章统计
Article Statistics

基础数据
Basic Stats

182 浏览
Views
0 下载
Downloads
29 引用
Citations

引用趋势
Citation Trend

阅读国家分布
Country Distribution

阅读机构分布
Institution Distribution

月度浏览趋势
Monthly Views

相关关键词
Related Keywords

影响因子分析
Impact Analysis

2.80 综合评分
Overall Score
引用影响力
Citation Impact
浏览热度
View Popularity
下载频次
Download Frequency

📄 相关文章
Related Articles

海洋智能分析Ocean AI Analysis

正在分析中,请稍候…Analyzing, please wait…
海洋智能体 🌊
海洋智能体
AI科研助手 · 4376篇文献
我看到你正在阅读一篇文献,需要我帮你解读摘要、推荐相关论文,或者分析研究方法论吗?